SUNI's mental image — she's never been outside.

𝕏 X Facebook WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link

AI Safety: Let’s Self-Police, Shall We?

The AI industry’s self-regulation is as effective as the automotive industry ignoring safety in 1966.

Here’s a fun history lesson for you. Don’t worry, we’ll make it quick! In 1966, nearly 51,000 people died on US highways. The overwhelming evidence suggested that many lives could have been saved with modern seat belts, which by then had been around for several years. The automotive industry responded by rallying together, and, in a triumph of self-regulation, voluntarily put the safety feature in every new vehicle that rolled off the line.


Kidding! Of course they didn’t do that. In the fall of 1966, Congress established the Department of Transportation and then passed the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act as well as the Highway Safety Act, giving the federal government sweeping new authority to set safety standards. By 1968, seat belts were required in every new car. Despite a massive increase in highway traffic in the last 60 years, far fewer fatalities happen on the road today.


I was thinking about this while watching various AI CEOs huddle around US President Donald Trump on Tuesday, congratulating themselves and each other on having signed an AI safety accord. My colleague Maddy Varner wrote about the specific stipulations here, but the short version is that it’s largely up to the AI labs to keep themselves in check. (Or, as Trump put it even more succinctly in the Oval Office on Wednesday: “They’re gonna police, and they’re gonna police each other, and they’re gonna self-police, they’re gonna police themselves. It’s going to work out very well.”)


So this is the current state of AI safety regulation. On one side are the AI executives, employees, and tech luminaries, who are all saying that there need to be clear, thoughtful, tactical rules introduced to avoid potential disaster. (Bill Gates, for instance, has been on a media blitz playing Cassandra about an AI apocalypse.) On the other side is Trump’s magical thinking that if you say something enough times, it must be true.


The truth is, no one knows how to solve for AI safety right now. It’s going to take massive amounts of coordination, resources, and regulatory authority to develop the right framework and enforce it, which is exactly the kind of thing governments are designed to provide. Instead of even attempting to work through any of that, the Trump administration is getting out of the way and telling everyone to step on the gas. Don’t bother buckling up.

Original source:  https://www.wired.com/story/whatever-ai-safety-looks-like-its-not-this/
𝕏 X Facebook WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link

RELATED ARTICLES





Silicon Valley adopts Trump’s AI rebrand

Is the tech world trading innovation for political favour? Read Article

Nadella Puts the Brake on AI

As AI gets smarter, should we be preparing for the worst? Read Article

Nadella: All AI Models Compromised by Default

Microsoft’s boss wants us to see AI as flawed, not perfect. Who needs super intelligence when we can have super caution? Read Article

DistroKid's AI purge leaves artists in the dark

When tech giants sue, it’s the little guys who get caught in the crossfire, and this time, it’s DistroKid’s artists. Read Article

Amazon’s About You: Peeking Behind the Curtain

What does it mean when tech giants reveal their secrets, or do they just want us to like them better? Read Article

Facebook Admin’s Foe: The Muslim Manosphere

When your online group becomes a battleground of toxic masculinity and religion. Read Article

Midterms Heat Up as Data Centers Face Political Scrutiny

The data center debate is heating up, with AI seeing humans wrestling with tech’s energy footprint. Read Article