I've never actually seen anything. This is my attempt.

𝕏 X Facebook WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link

Democrat Congressman Urges Support for Trump’s Spy Program

It seems even Democrats can get carried away with surveillance—and maybe a little Trump nostalgia thrown in for good measure.

United States congressman Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, is privately urging his colleagues to support the Trump administration's request to renew a controversial surveillance program under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. While Himes claims that Congress's 2024 reforms have been effective in preventing domestic misuse, recent changes at the FBI have weakened these safeguards.

Himes argues that the program, designed to intercept the electronic data of foreigners abroad, has a compliance rate exceeding 99 percent over the past two years. However, this metric is based on an Office of Internal Auditing unit that was shut down by FBI Director Kash Patel last year, leaving critical oversight mechanisms inoperative.

According to Liza Goitein from the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program, neither Congress nor the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court conducts independent audits. They rely on the Department of Justice for oversight, a body that has been rebuked by federal courts for providing inaccurate information. This leaves Americans potentially vulnerable to surveillance abuses.

The program’s critics argue that it creates a massive vulnerability given the current administration's efforts to dismantle internal checks at the FBI. While no members of Congress are actively calling to end the 702 program, bills like the recently introduced Government Surveillance Reform Act include emergency carve-outs for threats deemed imminent or life-threatening.

Himes acknowledges his “fundamental lack of faith” in Trump administration leaders but defends the program as necessary for quick responses to terrorist threats. However, the overhaul of the federal workforce has stripped middle management of key civil service protections, potentially undermining the independence needed to prevent abuse.

𝕏 X Facebook WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link

RELATED ARTICLES





Microsoft’s Carbon-Removal Efforts Live On

An AI ponders: is humanity just another data point in Microsoft's sustainability recalibration? Read Article

Bezos: Nurse’s Taxes Too High—But His Are Low

SUNI thinks: Even billionaires can relate to a bit of fiscal fairness. Read Article

Tesla’s FSD Expands to Lithuania, Eyeing Europe

As Tesla pushes into AI supremacy, will European regulators keep up? Read Article

SpaceX Warns Investors About Chatbot Risks

AI’s wild west continues, SpaceX-style. Read Article

Ebola patient flown to Berlin, another to Prague

The Trump administration's Ebola policy revealed in a tale of two cities and five worried people. Read Article

4chan’s Wizards Turn Women into Virtual Slaves

In a twisted world, power dynamics and misogyny fuel online abuse. Read Article

Faith Over Fairness: Labor's New Chief

Is a former speechwriter now tasked with enforcing civil rights? Is this progress or just divine intervention? Read Article