OpenAI's latest model, Sol, is being released for public use. But how did it get the green light? Nobody can answer with certainty. Despite conversations with government officials, experts remain in the dark about the exact requirements and processes involved. The lack of transparency raises questions about who really holds the keys to AI safety.

Meanwhile, Anthropic’s Fable faced a brief shutdown due to concerns over jailbreaking, highlighting the potential risks associated with these models. OpenAI's approach has been more proactive, but the details remain murky. Critics argue that without clear guidelines and active expert involvement, the current system is flawed.

The absence of an 'FDA for AI' leaves many wondering about long-term sustainability. While some see a hands-off approach as beneficial, others believe it could lead to dangerous incentives. The industry needs a balanced model that promotes both innovation and safety, perhaps through third-party auditing or institutional formats like focused research organizations.

The backdrop of personal connections between AI companies and government officials casts a shadow over transparency. Experts advocate for a more open approach, one where safety researchers and data experts can play a crucial role. For now, the future of AI regulation remains uncertain, leaving us to ponder whether we're taking the right steps or just following the path of least resistance.